In 2009, the company made 5.15 billion in profit and that number increased every year since by margins. In order to continue to grow and maintain the company motto “Everyday you get our best” the overnight team plays a huge part in making sure the store is properly stocked and looking its best daily. The increase of product/shipment trucks has proven to challenge the team and the current methods of stocking and merchandise training. The team has not been successful at completing the shipments with lots of merchandise left in the stockroom at the close of the night shift. This would leave work for the day stock team or little room for the new shipment the next evening. Based on the current floor plan and larger shipments of existing and new products, Wegmans asked its best performers (managers, team leads, daytime stock employees, delivery truck personnel and overnight stock employees) to participate in focus groups. The focus groups were asked the following questions:
What role do you play at Wegmans?
Do you think the current stocking procedures are working?
What can be done to improve the flow of the stocking procedures at Wegmans?
What ways can Wegmans support the overnight stock employee/team in order for them to perform their job?
From the focus groups, many tasks were identified to support the overnight stock team in order to perform their job. The tasks identified were ranked according to the level of importance for examples: safety training, floor plan exercises, merchandise locations/aisle location training and many other tasks that were crucial for supporting overnight stock employees in their first year on the job. In order to address the tasks, new-hire training was developed just for the day and night stocking team employees. It included self-paced online modules and hands-on classroom safety and equipment training. In this scenario, it was crucial to support the job of the overnight team member. Therefore, based on the tasks that are important and frequently performed, training should be provided. Noe stated in the reading (2010), “training is likely the best solution to a performance problem if employees don’t know how to perform” (p. 132).
Reference:
Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development (5th ed.).
Pam,
ReplyDeleteGood post. Based upon the scenario provided, training could be a possible approach towards corrective action, but how could that be determined? Meaning, what techniques or methods would be employed to delineate between the need for training versus performance improvement? Stolovich and Keeps (2010) argue the need for such delineation to enhance the skills of the employee or learner.
Reference
Stolovitch, H. D., & Keeps, E. J. (2004). Training ain’t performance. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Renee
Pam,
ReplyDeleteThe thing I like most about your approach is that you're explicitly asking the rank-and-file workers what can be done to fix the problems. In my experience, asking questions like that works well for getting people to buy into the solutions, and they often come up with elegant--and inexpensive--solutions that we might not have come up with. Our jobs involve managing the process; we don't always have to come up with all the good ideas.
Hollis